From e284483cbb362e2927c9a190846914509bfcc520 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Dave Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2026 21:11:07 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] story-kit: create 107_story_test_coverage_http_assets_rs_to_85 --- ...tory_test_coverage_http_assets_rs_to_85.md | 20 +++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+) create mode 100644 .story_kit/work/1_upcoming/107_story_test_coverage_http_assets_rs_to_85.md diff --git a/.story_kit/work/1_upcoming/107_story_test_coverage_http_assets_rs_to_85.md b/.story_kit/work/1_upcoming/107_story_test_coverage_http_assets_rs_to_85.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..3ccbb21 --- /dev/null +++ b/.story_kit/work/1_upcoming/107_story_test_coverage_http_assets_rs_to_85.md @@ -0,0 +1,20 @@ +--- +name: "Test Coverage: http/assets.rs to 85%" +--- + +# Story 107: Test Coverage: http/assets.rs to 85% + +## User Story + +As a developer, I want http/assets.rs to have at least 85% test coverage, so that regressions in static asset serving are caught early. + +## Acceptance Criteria + +- [ ] server/src/http/assets.rs reaches at least 85% line coverage (currently 70%, 18 lines missed) +- [ ] cargo clippy passes with no warnings +- [ ] cargo test passes with all tests green +- [ ] No changes to production code, only test code added + +## Out of Scope + +- TBD