Added some crazy AI generated ideas, as a brainstorming exercise.
This commit is contained in:
663
docs/use-case-4-identity-networks.md
Normal file
663
docs/use-case-4-identity-networks.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,663 @@
|
||||
# Use Case 4: Sybil-Resistant Identity Networks
|
||||
|
||||
## The Identity Problem in Web3
|
||||
|
||||
Decentralized systems face a fundamental challenge: how to establish identity and reputation without central authorities while preventing Sybil attacks.
|
||||
|
||||
### Current Identity System Failures
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Centralized Identity Providers**
|
||||
- Single points of failure (KYC providers, social logins)
|
||||
- Privacy violations through data aggregation
|
||||
- Censorship and deplatforming risks
|
||||
- Geographic and political exclusion
|
||||
|
||||
2. **Token-Based Sybil Resistance**
|
||||
- Plutocratic (wealthy users have more influence)
|
||||
- Doesn't represent real human relationships
|
||||
- Vulnerable to borrowing/renting attacks
|
||||
- Excludes users without capital
|
||||
|
||||
3. **Proof of Personhood Ceremonies**
|
||||
- Require synchronous participation
|
||||
- Exclude users in certain timezones
|
||||
- Technical barriers for non-technical users
|
||||
- Still vulnerable to sophisticated attacks
|
||||
|
||||
## The BFT-CRDT Identity Solution
|
||||
|
||||
A web of trust that grows organically through attestations, resistant to Sybil attacks through social graph analysis:
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
Traditional Identity:
|
||||
[Central Authority] → [Identity Verification] → [Single Identity Record]
|
||||
↓ ↓ ↓
|
||||
[Can be hacked] [Privacy violation] [Can be revoked]
|
||||
|
||||
BFT-CRDT Identity Network:
|
||||
[User A] ←→ [User B]
|
||||
↓ × ↓
|
||||
[User C] ←→ [User D]
|
||||
↓
|
||||
[Attestations merge via CRDT]
|
||||
↓
|
||||
[Emergent trust graph]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Key Innovation: Trust Without Consensus
|
||||
|
||||
- No global agreement on who is "verified"
|
||||
- Each participant maintains their own trust graph
|
||||
- Applications interpret the graph based on their needs
|
||||
- Sybil resistance emerges from graph topology
|
||||
|
||||
## Architecture
|
||||
|
||||
### Core Data Structures
|
||||
|
||||
```rust
|
||||
pub struct IdentityCRDT {
|
||||
// All attestations in the network
|
||||
attestations: Map<AttestationId, Attestation>,
|
||||
|
||||
// Revocations (tombstones)
|
||||
revocations: Set<AttestationId>,
|
||||
|
||||
// Computed trust paths
|
||||
trust_cache: TrustCache,
|
||||
|
||||
// Anti-Sybil metrics
|
||||
sybil_scores: Map<IdentityId, SybilScore>,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
pub struct Attestation {
|
||||
pub id: AttestationId,
|
||||
pub issuer: IdentityId,
|
||||
pub subject: IdentityId,
|
||||
pub claim_type: ClaimType,
|
||||
pub claim_value: ClaimValue,
|
||||
pub confidence: u8, // 0-100
|
||||
pub context: AttestationContext,
|
||||
pub timestamp: Timestamp,
|
||||
pub expiry: Option<Timestamp>,
|
||||
pub signature: Signature,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
pub enum ClaimType {
|
||||
// Social attestations
|
||||
KnowsPersonally,
|
||||
MetInPerson,
|
||||
WorkedWith,
|
||||
FamilyMember,
|
||||
|
||||
// Skill attestations
|
||||
TechnicalSkill(String),
|
||||
ProfessionalRole(String),
|
||||
EducationCredential(String),
|
||||
|
||||
// Behavior attestations
|
||||
TrustedTrader,
|
||||
ReliableCounterparty,
|
||||
GoodCitizen,
|
||||
|
||||
// Verification attestations
|
||||
VerifiedEmail(Hash),
|
||||
VerifiedPhone(Hash),
|
||||
VerifiedAddress(Hash),
|
||||
BiometricHash(Hash),
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
pub struct AttestationContext {
|
||||
// Where/how the attestation was made
|
||||
pub location: Option<Location>,
|
||||
pub event: Option<String>,
|
||||
pub proof_of_interaction: Option<InteractionProof>,
|
||||
pub metadata: Map<String, String>,
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Trust Computation
|
||||
|
||||
```rust
|
||||
impl IdentityCRDT {
|
||||
// Calculate trust between two identities
|
||||
pub fn calculate_trust(
|
||||
&self,
|
||||
source: IdentityId,
|
||||
target: IdentityId,
|
||||
claim_type: ClaimType,
|
||||
params: TrustParams,
|
||||
) -> TrustScore {
|
||||
// Find all paths from source to target
|
||||
let paths = self.find_trust_paths(source, target, params.max_depth);
|
||||
|
||||
if paths.is_empty() {
|
||||
return TrustScore::Unknown;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Weight paths by:
|
||||
// - Length (shorter = better)
|
||||
// - Attestation confidence
|
||||
// - Recency
|
||||
// - Path diversity
|
||||
let weighted_scores: Vec<f64> = paths
|
||||
.iter()
|
||||
.map(|path| self.score_path(path, claim_type, params))
|
||||
.collect();
|
||||
|
||||
// Aggregate using params.aggregation_method
|
||||
let final_score = match params.aggregation_method {
|
||||
AggregationMethod::Maximum => weighted_scores.max(),
|
||||
AggregationMethod::Average => weighted_scores.average(),
|
||||
AggregationMethod::Median => weighted_scores.median(),
|
||||
AggregationMethod::WeightedByDiversity => {
|
||||
self.diversity_weighted_aggregate(paths, weighted_scores)
|
||||
}
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
TrustScore {
|
||||
value: final_score,
|
||||
confidence: self.calculate_confidence(paths.len(), weighted_scores.variance()),
|
||||
paths_found: paths.len(),
|
||||
computation_time: timestamp(),
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
fn score_path(
|
||||
&self,
|
||||
path: &TrustPath,
|
||||
claim_type: ClaimType,
|
||||
params: &TrustParams,
|
||||
) -> f64 {
|
||||
let mut score = 1.0;
|
||||
|
||||
for edge in &path.edges {
|
||||
let attestation = &self.attestations[&edge.attestation_id];
|
||||
|
||||
// Confidence factor
|
||||
score *= (attestation.confidence as f64) / 100.0;
|
||||
|
||||
// Recency factor
|
||||
let age = timestamp() - attestation.timestamp;
|
||||
score *= params.recency_decay.decay_factor(age);
|
||||
|
||||
// Claim type relevance
|
||||
score *= params.claim_relevance(attestation.claim_type, claim_type);
|
||||
|
||||
// Penalize long paths
|
||||
score *= params.path_length_penalty.pow(path.edges.len());
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
score
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Sybil Resistance Mechanisms
|
||||
|
||||
```rust
|
||||
pub struct SybilDetector {
|
||||
// Network topology analysis
|
||||
pub min_clustering_coefficient: f64,
|
||||
pub max_betweenness_centrality: f64,
|
||||
pub min_attestation_diversity: f64,
|
||||
|
||||
// Temporal analysis
|
||||
pub min_account_age: Duration,
|
||||
pub max_attestation_rate: f64,
|
||||
|
||||
// Behavioral analysis
|
||||
pub interaction_requirements: InteractionRequirements,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
impl SybilDetector {
|
||||
pub fn analyze_identity(&self, id: IdentityId, graph: &IdentityCRDT) -> SybilScore {
|
||||
let mut score = SybilScore::default();
|
||||
|
||||
// 1. Graph topology checks
|
||||
score.clustering = self.check_clustering(id, graph);
|
||||
score.centrality = self.check_centrality(id, graph);
|
||||
|
||||
// 2. Attestation pattern checks
|
||||
score.attestation_diversity = self.check_attestation_diversity(id, graph);
|
||||
score.temporal_distribution = self.check_temporal_patterns(id, graph);
|
||||
|
||||
// 3. Interaction proof checks
|
||||
score.interaction_quality = self.check_interactions(id, graph);
|
||||
|
||||
// 4. Economic cost analysis
|
||||
score.attack_cost = self.estimate_attack_cost(id, graph);
|
||||
|
||||
score
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
fn check_clustering(&self, id: IdentityId, graph: &IdentityCRDT) -> f64 {
|
||||
// Real social networks have high clustering
|
||||
// Sybil networks tend to be tree-like
|
||||
let neighbors = graph.get_neighbors(id);
|
||||
let interconnections = graph.count_edges_between(neighbors);
|
||||
let possible_connections = neighbors.len() * (neighbors.len() - 1) / 2;
|
||||
|
||||
interconnections as f64 / possible_connections as f64
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Use Cases
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Decentralized KYC/AML
|
||||
|
||||
```rust
|
||||
pub struct DecentralizedKYC {
|
||||
required_attestations: Vec<RequiredAttestation>,
|
||||
trust_threshold: f64,
|
||||
approved_issuers: Option<Set<IdentityId>>,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
pub struct RequiredAttestation {
|
||||
claim_types: Vec<ClaimType>,
|
||||
min_confidence: u8,
|
||||
max_age: Duration,
|
||||
min_paths: usize,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
impl DecentralizedKYC {
|
||||
pub fn verify_identity(
|
||||
&self,
|
||||
identity: IdentityId,
|
||||
graph: &IdentityCRDT,
|
||||
verifier: IdentityId,
|
||||
) -> KYCResult {
|
||||
let mut results = Vec::new();
|
||||
|
||||
for requirement in &self.required_attestations {
|
||||
let attestations = graph.find_attestations(
|
||||
identity,
|
||||
&requirement.claim_types,
|
||||
verifier,
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
let valid_attestations = attestations
|
||||
.filter(|a| a.confidence >= requirement.min_confidence)
|
||||
.filter(|a| a.age() <= requirement.max_age)
|
||||
.filter(|a| self.is_approved_issuer(a.issuer))
|
||||
.collect::<Vec<_>>();
|
||||
|
||||
results.push(RequirementResult {
|
||||
requirement: requirement.clone(),
|
||||
found: valid_attestations.len(),
|
||||
required: requirement.min_paths,
|
||||
passed: valid_attestations.len() >= requirement.min_paths,
|
||||
});
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
KYCResult {
|
||||
identity,
|
||||
passed: results.iter().all(|r| r.passed),
|
||||
details: results,
|
||||
timestamp: timestamp(),
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Reputation-Based Governance
|
||||
|
||||
```rust
|
||||
pub struct ReputationGovernance {
|
||||
// Different reputation types have different weights
|
||||
reputation_weights: Map<ClaimType, f64>,
|
||||
|
||||
// Minimum reputation for participation
|
||||
participation_threshold: f64,
|
||||
|
||||
// How reputation translates to voting power
|
||||
power_curve: PowerCurve,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
impl ReputationGovernance {
|
||||
pub fn calculate_voting_power(
|
||||
&self,
|
||||
voter: IdentityId,
|
||||
graph: &IdentityCRDT,
|
||||
context: &GovernanceContext,
|
||||
) -> VotingPower {
|
||||
let mut weighted_reputation = 0.0;
|
||||
|
||||
// Aggregate different types of reputation
|
||||
for (claim_type, weight) in &self.reputation_weights {
|
||||
let reputation = graph.calculate_reputation(
|
||||
voter,
|
||||
claim_type.clone(),
|
||||
&context.reputation_params,
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
weighted_reputation += reputation.value * weight;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Check participation threshold
|
||||
if weighted_reputation < self.participation_threshold {
|
||||
return VotingPower::Ineligible;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Apply power curve (e.g., quadratic)
|
||||
let power = self.power_curve.apply(weighted_reputation);
|
||||
|
||||
VotingPower::Eligible {
|
||||
power,
|
||||
reputation_score: weighted_reputation,
|
||||
calculation_method: self.power_curve.description(),
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Social Recovery
|
||||
|
||||
```rust
|
||||
pub struct SocialRecovery {
|
||||
pub identity: IdentityId,
|
||||
pub recovery_threshold: usize,
|
||||
pub guardians: Vec<Guardian>,
|
||||
pub time_delay: Duration,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
pub struct Guardian {
|
||||
pub identity: IdentityId,
|
||||
pub relationship: ClaimType,
|
||||
pub min_relationship_age: Duration,
|
||||
pub weight: u32,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
impl SocialRecovery {
|
||||
pub fn initiate_recovery(
|
||||
&self,
|
||||
new_key: PublicKey,
|
||||
guardian_signatures: Vec<GuardianSignature>,
|
||||
graph: &IdentityCRDT,
|
||||
) -> Result<RecoveryRequest> {
|
||||
// Verify guardians
|
||||
let mut total_weight = 0u32;
|
||||
let mut verified_guardians = Vec::new();
|
||||
|
||||
for sig in guardian_signatures {
|
||||
// Check guardian is valid
|
||||
let guardian = self.guardians
|
||||
.iter()
|
||||
.find(|g| g.identity == sig.guardian)
|
||||
.ok_or("Unknown guardian")?;
|
||||
|
||||
// Verify relationship still exists
|
||||
let relationship = graph.verify_relationship(
|
||||
self.identity,
|
||||
guardian.identity,
|
||||
guardian.relationship.clone(),
|
||||
)?;
|
||||
|
||||
// Check relationship age
|
||||
if relationship.age() < guardian.min_relationship_age {
|
||||
return Err("Relationship too new");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Verify signature
|
||||
sig.verify(&new_key)?;
|
||||
|
||||
total_weight += guardian.weight;
|
||||
verified_guardians.push(sig.guardian);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Check threshold
|
||||
if verified_guardians.len() < self.recovery_threshold {
|
||||
return Err("Insufficient guardians");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
Ok(RecoveryRequest {
|
||||
identity: self.identity,
|
||||
new_key,
|
||||
guardians: verified_guardians,
|
||||
initiated_at: timestamp(),
|
||||
executable_at: timestamp() + self.time_delay,
|
||||
})
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. Skill-Based Matching
|
||||
|
||||
```rust
|
||||
pub struct SkillMarketplace {
|
||||
pub skill_graph: IdentityCRDT,
|
||||
pub matching_params: MatchingParams,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
impl SkillMarketplace {
|
||||
pub fn find_providers(
|
||||
&self,
|
||||
seeker: IdentityId,
|
||||
required_skills: Vec<Skill>,
|
||||
preferences: MatchingPreferences,
|
||||
) -> Vec<SkillMatch> {
|
||||
let mut candidates = Vec::new();
|
||||
|
||||
// Find all identities with required skills
|
||||
for skill in &required_skills {
|
||||
let providers = self.skill_graph.find_by_claim(
|
||||
ClaimType::TechnicalSkill(skill.name.clone()),
|
||||
preferences.min_confidence,
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
for provider in providers {
|
||||
// Calculate trust path from seeker
|
||||
let trust = self.skill_graph.calculate_trust(
|
||||
seeker,
|
||||
provider.identity,
|
||||
ClaimType::TechnicalSkill(skill.name.clone()),
|
||||
preferences.trust_params.clone(),
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
// Check if meets minimum trust
|
||||
if trust.value >= preferences.min_trust {
|
||||
candidates.push(SkillMatch {
|
||||
provider: provider.identity,
|
||||
skill: skill.clone(),
|
||||
trust_score: trust.value,
|
||||
attestations: provider.attestations,
|
||||
estimated_rate: self.estimate_rate(&provider, skill),
|
||||
});
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Sort by preference
|
||||
candidates.sort_by(|a, b| {
|
||||
preferences.ranking_function(a, b)
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
candidates
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Privacy Features
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Selective Disclosure
|
||||
|
||||
```rust
|
||||
pub struct PrivateAttestation {
|
||||
// Public part
|
||||
pub id: AttestationId,
|
||||
pub issuer: IdentityId,
|
||||
pub subject_commitment: Commitment,
|
||||
pub claim_type: ClaimType,
|
||||
pub timestamp: Timestamp,
|
||||
|
||||
// Private part (revealed selectively)
|
||||
pub private_data: EncryptedData,
|
||||
pub reveal_key: Option<RevealKey>,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
impl PrivateAttestation {
|
||||
pub fn reveal_to(&self, recipient: IdentityId) -> RevealToken {
|
||||
// Generate reveal token for specific recipient
|
||||
let token = RevealToken {
|
||||
attestation_id: self.id,
|
||||
recipient,
|
||||
expiry: timestamp() + Duration::hours(24),
|
||||
scope: RevealScope::FullClaim,
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
token.encrypt_for(recipient)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Zero-Knowledge Proofs
|
||||
|
||||
```rust
|
||||
pub struct ZKIdentityClaim {
|
||||
// Prove properties without revealing identity
|
||||
pub proof: ZKProof,
|
||||
pub public_inputs: PublicInputs,
|
||||
pub nullifier: Nullifier, // Prevent double-usage
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
impl IdentityCRDT {
|
||||
pub fn prove_reputation_threshold(
|
||||
&self,
|
||||
identity: IdentityId,
|
||||
threshold: f64,
|
||||
claim_type: ClaimType,
|
||||
) -> ZKIdentityClaim {
|
||||
// Generate proof that reputation > threshold
|
||||
// without revealing actual reputation or identity
|
||||
let witness = self.gather_reputation_witness(identity, claim_type);
|
||||
let proof = generate_zk_proof(witness, threshold);
|
||||
|
||||
ZKIdentityClaim {
|
||||
proof,
|
||||
public_inputs: PublicInputs { threshold, claim_type },
|
||||
nullifier: derive_nullifier(identity, timestamp()),
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Implementation Guide
|
||||
|
||||
### Starting an Identity Network
|
||||
|
||||
```typescript
|
||||
// 1. Initialize identity
|
||||
const identity = new Identity({
|
||||
publicKey: await generateKeypair(),
|
||||
profile: {
|
||||
displayName: "Alice",
|
||||
avatar: "ipfs://...",
|
||||
},
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
// 2. Create initial attestations
|
||||
await identity.attestTo({
|
||||
subject: "bob.eth",
|
||||
claimType: "KnowsPersonally",
|
||||
confidence: 95,
|
||||
context: {
|
||||
event: "ETH Denver 2024",
|
||||
proof: interactionProof,
|
||||
},
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
// 3. Join identity network
|
||||
const network = new IdentityNetwork({
|
||||
bootstrapPeers: ["peer1", "peer2"],
|
||||
storage: new IPFSStorage(),
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
await network.publishIdentity(identity);
|
||||
await network.syncAttestations();
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Building Trust Relationships
|
||||
|
||||
```typescript
|
||||
// Organic trust building
|
||||
async function buildTrust() {
|
||||
// 1. Attend events and meet people
|
||||
const eventAttestations = await collectEventAttestations("ETH Denver");
|
||||
|
||||
// 2. Work on projects together
|
||||
const projectAttestations = await collaborateOnProject({
|
||||
project: "DeFi Protocol",
|
||||
teammates: ["carol.eth", "dave.eth"],
|
||||
duration: "3 months",
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
// 3. Trade/interact on-chain
|
||||
const onChainAttestations = await generateFromOnChain({
|
||||
interactions: getOnChainInteractions(),
|
||||
threshold: 5, // minimum interactions
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
// 4. Publish attestations
|
||||
await network.publishBatch([
|
||||
...eventAttestations,
|
||||
...projectAttestations,
|
||||
...onChainAttestations,
|
||||
]);
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Consuming Identity Data
|
||||
|
||||
```typescript
|
||||
// For applications
|
||||
class IdentityConsumer {
|
||||
constructor(
|
||||
private network: IdentityNetwork,
|
||||
private requirements: TrustRequirements,
|
||||
) {}
|
||||
|
||||
async verifyUser(userId: string): Promise<VerificationResult> {
|
||||
// 1. Calculate trust from your perspective
|
||||
const trust = await this.network.calculateTrust(
|
||||
this.identity,
|
||||
userId,
|
||||
this.requirements.claimTypes,
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
// 2. Check Sybil resistance
|
||||
const sybilScore = await this.network.getSybilScore(userId);
|
||||
|
||||
// 3. Verify specific claims if needed
|
||||
const claims = await this.network.getAttestations(
|
||||
userId,
|
||||
this.requirements.requiredClaims,
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
return {
|
||||
trusted: trust.value > this.requirements.minTrust,
|
||||
sybilRisk: sybilScore.risk,
|
||||
verifiedClaims: claims,
|
||||
};
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Conclusion
|
||||
|
||||
BFT-CRDT identity networks solve the fundamental paradox of decentralized identity:
|
||||
|
||||
- **No Central Authority**: Trust emerges from the network
|
||||
- **Sybil Resistant**: Graph analysis detects fake identities
|
||||
- **Privacy Preserving**: Selective disclosure and ZK proofs
|
||||
- **Contextual**: Different apps interpret trust differently
|
||||
- **Organic Growth**: Builds on natural human relationships
|
||||
|
||||
This enables:
|
||||
- Truly decentralized social networks
|
||||
- Reputation-based lending without credit scores
|
||||
- Skills marketplaces without centralized platforms
|
||||
- Democratic governance beyond token-voting
|
||||
- Social recovery that actually works
|
||||
|
||||
The key insight: **Identity is not a binary state but a graph of relationships that can be interpreted contextually while remaining resistant to attacks.**
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user