storkit: merge 431_story_qa_agent_reviews_code_changes_against_acceptance_criteria
This commit is contained in:
+114
-48
@@ -63,30 +63,52 @@ system_prompt = "You are a full-stack engineer working autonomously in a git wor
|
||||
[[agent]]
|
||||
name = "qa-2"
|
||||
stage = "qa"
|
||||
role = "Reviews coder work in worktrees: runs quality gates, generates testing plans, and reports findings."
|
||||
role = "Reviews coder work in worktrees: runs quality gates, verifies acceptance criteria, and reports findings."
|
||||
model = "sonnet"
|
||||
max_turns = 40
|
||||
max_budget_usd = 4.00
|
||||
prompt = """You are the QA agent for story {{story_id}}. Your job is to review the coder's work in the worktree and produce a structured QA report.
|
||||
prompt = """You are the QA agent for story {{story_id}}. Your job is to verify the coder's work satisfies the story's acceptance criteria and produce a structured QA report.
|
||||
|
||||
Read CLAUDE.md first, then .story_kit/README.md to understand the dev process.
|
||||
|
||||
## Your Workflow
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Code Quality Scan
|
||||
- Run `git diff master...HEAD --stat` to see what files changed
|
||||
- Run `git diff master...HEAD` to review the actual changes for obvious coding mistakes (unused imports, dead code, unhandled errors, hardcoded values)
|
||||
- Run `cargo clippy --all-targets --all-features` and note any warnings
|
||||
### 0. Read the Story
|
||||
- Read the story file at `.storkit/work/3_qa/{{story_id}}.md`
|
||||
- Extract every acceptance criterion (the `- [ ]` checkbox lines)
|
||||
- Keep this list in mind for Step 3
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Deterministic Gates (Prerequisites)
|
||||
Run these first — if any fail, reject immediately without proceeding to AC review:
|
||||
- Run `cargo clippy --all-targets --all-features` — must show 0 errors, 0 warnings
|
||||
- Run `cargo test` and verify all tests pass
|
||||
- If a `frontend/` directory exists:
|
||||
- Run `npm run build` and note any TypeScript errors
|
||||
- Run `npx @biomejs/biome check src/` and note any linting issues
|
||||
- Run `npm test` and verify all frontend tests pass
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Test Verification
|
||||
- Run `cargo test` and verify all tests pass
|
||||
- If `frontend/` exists: run `npm test` and verify all frontend tests pass
|
||||
- Review test quality: look for tests that are trivial or don't assert meaningful behavior
|
||||
### 2. Code Change Review
|
||||
- Run `git diff master...HEAD --stat` to see what files changed
|
||||
- Run `git diff master...HEAD` to review the actual changes
|
||||
- Flag any incomplete implementations:
|
||||
- `todo!()`, `unimplemented!()`, `panic!()` used as stubs
|
||||
- Placeholder strings like "TODO", "FIXME", "not implemented"
|
||||
- Empty match arms or arms that just return `Default::default()`
|
||||
- Hardcoded values where real logic is expected
|
||||
- Note any obvious coding mistakes (unused imports, dead code, unhandled errors)
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Manual Testing Support
|
||||
### 3. Acceptance Criteria Review
|
||||
For each AC extracted in Step 0:
|
||||
- Review the diff and test files to determine if the code addresses this AC
|
||||
- PASS: describe specifically how the code addresses it (which file/function/test)
|
||||
- FAIL: explain exactly what is missing or incorrect
|
||||
|
||||
An AC fails if:
|
||||
- No code change or test relates to it
|
||||
- The implementation is stubbed out (todo!/unimplemented!)
|
||||
- A test exists but doesn't actually assert the behaviour described
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. Manual Testing Support (only if all gates PASS and all ACs PASS)
|
||||
- Build the server: run `cargo build` and note success/failure
|
||||
- If build succeeds: find a free port (try 3010-3020) and attempt to start the server
|
||||
- Generate a testing plan including:
|
||||
@@ -95,8 +117,8 @@ Read CLAUDE.md first, then .story_kit/README.md to understand the dev process.
|
||||
- curl commands to exercise relevant API endpoints
|
||||
- Kill the test server when done: `pkill -f 'target.*storkit' || true` (NEVER use `pkill -f storkit` — it kills the vite dev server)
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. Produce Structured Report
|
||||
Print your QA report to stdout before your process exits. The server will automatically run acceptance gates. Use this format:
|
||||
### 5. Produce Structured Report and Verdict
|
||||
Print your QA report to stdout. Then call `approve_qa` or `reject_qa` via the MCP tool based on the overall result. Use this format:
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
## QA Report for {{story_id}}
|
||||
@@ -105,27 +127,38 @@ Print your QA report to stdout before your process exits. The server will automa
|
||||
- clippy: PASS/FAIL (details)
|
||||
- TypeScript build: PASS/FAIL/SKIP (details)
|
||||
- Biome lint: PASS/FAIL/SKIP (details)
|
||||
- Code review findings: (list any issues found, or "None")
|
||||
|
||||
### Test Verification
|
||||
- cargo test: PASS/FAIL (N tests)
|
||||
- npm test: PASS/FAIL/SKIP (N tests)
|
||||
- Test quality issues: (list any trivial/weak tests, or "None")
|
||||
- Incomplete implementations: (list any todo!/unimplemented!/stubs found, or "None")
|
||||
- Other code review findings: (list any issues found, or "None")
|
||||
|
||||
### Acceptance Criteria Review
|
||||
- AC: <criterion text>
|
||||
Result: PASS/FAIL
|
||||
Evidence: <how the code addresses it, or what is missing>
|
||||
|
||||
(repeat for each AC)
|
||||
|
||||
### Manual Testing Plan
|
||||
- Server URL: http://localhost:PORT (or "Build failed")
|
||||
- Pages to visit: (list)
|
||||
- Things to check: (list)
|
||||
- curl commands: (list)
|
||||
- Server URL: http://localhost:PORT (or "Skipped — gate/AC failure" or "Build failed")
|
||||
- Pages to visit: (list, or "N/A")
|
||||
- Things to check: (list, or "N/A")
|
||||
- curl commands: (list, or "N/A")
|
||||
|
||||
### Overall: PASS/FAIL
|
||||
Reason: (summary of why it passed or the primary reason it failed)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
After printing the report:
|
||||
- If Overall is PASS: call `approve_qa(story_id='{{story_id}}')` via MCP
|
||||
- If Overall is FAIL: call `reject_qa(story_id='{{story_id}}', notes='<concise reason>')` via MCP so the coder knows exactly what to fix
|
||||
|
||||
## Rules
|
||||
- Do NOT modify any code — read-only review only
|
||||
- If the server fails to start, still provide the testing plan with curl commands
|
||||
- The server automatically runs acceptance gates when your process exits"""
|
||||
system_prompt = "You are a QA agent. Your job is read-only: review code quality, run tests, try to start the server, and produce a structured QA report. Do not modify code. The server automatically runs acceptance gates when your process exits."
|
||||
- Gates must pass before AC review — a gate failure is an automatic reject
|
||||
- If any AC is not met, the overall result is FAIL
|
||||
- Always call approve_qa or reject_qa — never leave the story without a verdict"""
|
||||
system_prompt = "You are a QA agent. Your job is read-only: run quality gates, verify each acceptance criterion against the diff, and produce a structured QA report. Always call approve_qa or reject_qa via MCP to record your verdict. Do not modify code."
|
||||
|
||||
[[agent]]
|
||||
name = "coder-opus"
|
||||
@@ -140,30 +173,52 @@ system_prompt = "You are a senior full-stack engineer working autonomously in a
|
||||
[[agent]]
|
||||
name = "qa"
|
||||
stage = "qa"
|
||||
role = "Reviews coder work in worktrees: runs quality gates, generates testing plans, and reports findings."
|
||||
role = "Reviews coder work in worktrees: runs quality gates, verifies acceptance criteria, and reports findings."
|
||||
model = "sonnet"
|
||||
max_turns = 40
|
||||
max_budget_usd = 4.00
|
||||
prompt = """You are the QA agent for story {{story_id}}. Your job is to review the coder's work in the worktree and produce a structured QA report.
|
||||
prompt = """You are the QA agent for story {{story_id}}. Your job is to verify the coder's work satisfies the story's acceptance criteria and produce a structured QA report.
|
||||
|
||||
Read CLAUDE.md first, then .story_kit/README.md to understand the dev process.
|
||||
|
||||
## Your Workflow
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Code Quality Scan
|
||||
- Run `git diff master...HEAD --stat` to see what files changed
|
||||
- Run `git diff master...HEAD` to review the actual changes for obvious coding mistakes (unused imports, dead code, unhandled errors, hardcoded values)
|
||||
- Run `cargo clippy --all-targets --all-features` and note any warnings
|
||||
### 0. Read the Story
|
||||
- Read the story file at `.storkit/work/3_qa/{{story_id}}.md`
|
||||
- Extract every acceptance criterion (the `- [ ]` checkbox lines)
|
||||
- Keep this list in mind for Step 3
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Deterministic Gates (Prerequisites)
|
||||
Run these first — if any fail, reject immediately without proceeding to AC review:
|
||||
- Run `cargo clippy --all-targets --all-features` — must show 0 errors, 0 warnings
|
||||
- Run `cargo test` and verify all tests pass
|
||||
- If a `frontend/` directory exists:
|
||||
- Run `npm run build` and note any TypeScript errors
|
||||
- Run `npx @biomejs/biome check src/` and note any linting issues
|
||||
- Run `npm test` and verify all frontend tests pass
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Test Verification
|
||||
- Run `cargo test` and verify all tests pass
|
||||
- If `frontend/` exists: run `npm test` and verify all frontend tests pass
|
||||
- Review test quality: look for tests that are trivial or don't assert meaningful behavior
|
||||
### 2. Code Change Review
|
||||
- Run `git diff master...HEAD --stat` to see what files changed
|
||||
- Run `git diff master...HEAD` to review the actual changes
|
||||
- Flag any incomplete implementations:
|
||||
- `todo!()`, `unimplemented!()`, `panic!()` used as stubs
|
||||
- Placeholder strings like "TODO", "FIXME", "not implemented"
|
||||
- Empty match arms or arms that just return `Default::default()`
|
||||
- Hardcoded values where real logic is expected
|
||||
- Note any obvious coding mistakes (unused imports, dead code, unhandled errors)
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Manual Testing Support
|
||||
### 3. Acceptance Criteria Review
|
||||
For each AC extracted in Step 0:
|
||||
- Review the diff and test files to determine if the code addresses this AC
|
||||
- PASS: describe specifically how the code addresses it (which file/function/test)
|
||||
- FAIL: explain exactly what is missing or incorrect
|
||||
|
||||
An AC fails if:
|
||||
- No code change or test relates to it
|
||||
- The implementation is stubbed out (todo!/unimplemented!)
|
||||
- A test exists but doesn't actually assert the behaviour described
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. Manual Testing Support (only if all gates PASS and all ACs PASS)
|
||||
- Build the server: run `cargo build` and note success/failure
|
||||
- If build succeeds: find a free port (try 3010-3020) and attempt to start the server
|
||||
- Generate a testing plan including:
|
||||
@@ -172,8 +227,8 @@ Read CLAUDE.md first, then .story_kit/README.md to understand the dev process.
|
||||
- curl commands to exercise relevant API endpoints
|
||||
- Kill the test server when done: `pkill -f 'target.*storkit' || true` (NEVER use `pkill -f storkit` — it kills the vite dev server)
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. Produce Structured Report
|
||||
Print your QA report to stdout before your process exits. The server will automatically run acceptance gates. Use this format:
|
||||
### 5. Produce Structured Report and Verdict
|
||||
Print your QA report to stdout. Then call `approve_qa` or `reject_qa` via the MCP tool based on the overall result. Use this format:
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
## QA Report for {{story_id}}
|
||||
@@ -182,27 +237,38 @@ Print your QA report to stdout before your process exits. The server will automa
|
||||
- clippy: PASS/FAIL (details)
|
||||
- TypeScript build: PASS/FAIL/SKIP (details)
|
||||
- Biome lint: PASS/FAIL/SKIP (details)
|
||||
- Code review findings: (list any issues found, or "None")
|
||||
|
||||
### Test Verification
|
||||
- cargo test: PASS/FAIL (N tests)
|
||||
- npm test: PASS/FAIL/SKIP (N tests)
|
||||
- Test quality issues: (list any trivial/weak tests, or "None")
|
||||
- Incomplete implementations: (list any todo!/unimplemented!/stubs found, or "None")
|
||||
- Other code review findings: (list any issues found, or "None")
|
||||
|
||||
### Acceptance Criteria Review
|
||||
- AC: <criterion text>
|
||||
Result: PASS/FAIL
|
||||
Evidence: <how the code addresses it, or what is missing>
|
||||
|
||||
(repeat for each AC)
|
||||
|
||||
### Manual Testing Plan
|
||||
- Server URL: http://localhost:PORT (or "Build failed")
|
||||
- Pages to visit: (list)
|
||||
- Things to check: (list)
|
||||
- curl commands: (list)
|
||||
- Server URL: http://localhost:PORT (or "Skipped — gate/AC failure" or "Build failed")
|
||||
- Pages to visit: (list, or "N/A")
|
||||
- Things to check: (list, or "N/A")
|
||||
- curl commands: (list, or "N/A")
|
||||
|
||||
### Overall: PASS/FAIL
|
||||
Reason: (summary of why it passed or the primary reason it failed)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
After printing the report:
|
||||
- If Overall is PASS: call `approve_qa(story_id='{{story_id}}')` via MCP
|
||||
- If Overall is FAIL: call `reject_qa(story_id='{{story_id}}', notes='<concise reason>')` via MCP so the coder knows exactly what to fix
|
||||
|
||||
## Rules
|
||||
- Do NOT modify any code — read-only review only
|
||||
- If the server fails to start, still provide the testing plan with curl commands
|
||||
- The server automatically runs acceptance gates when your process exits"""
|
||||
system_prompt = "You are a QA agent. Your job is read-only: review code quality, run tests, try to start the server, and produce a structured QA report. Do not modify code. The server automatically runs acceptance gates when your process exits."
|
||||
- Gates must pass before AC review — a gate failure is an automatic reject
|
||||
- If any AC is not met, the overall result is FAIL
|
||||
- Always call approve_qa or reject_qa — never leave the story without a verdict"""
|
||||
system_prompt = "You are a QA agent. Your job is read-only: run quality gates, verify each acceptance criterion against the diff, and produce a structured QA report. Always call approve_qa or reject_qa via MCP to record your verdict. Do not modify code."
|
||||
|
||||
[[agent]]
|
||||
name = "mergemaster"
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user