huskies: create 474_story_per_file_test_coverage_report_with_improvement_targets
This commit is contained in:
+5
-5
@@ -10,11 +10,11 @@ As a developer, I want a standardised JSON output format for test coverage so th
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
## Acceptance Criteria
|
## Acceptance Criteria
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
- [ ] script/test_coverage saves per-file coverage data to .coverage_files.json (language-agnostic format)
|
- [ ] Define a standard `.coverage_report.json` format: `{ "overall": float, "threshold": float, "files": [{ "path": string, "coverage": float }] }`
|
||||||
- [ ] Rust coverage: uses cargo llvm-cov --json to extract per-file line coverage
|
- [ ] Update huskies' own `script/test_coverage` to write `.coverage_report.json` in this format (Rust via `cargo llvm-cov --json`, frontend via vitest)
|
||||||
- [ ] Frontend coverage: parses vitest coverage output for per-file data
|
- [ ] `coverage` bot command reads `.coverage_report.json` and shows overall percentage plus top 5 lowest-covered files as improvement targets
|
||||||
- [ ] coverage bot command shows top N lowest-covered files when cached data is available
|
- [ ] Document the `.coverage_report.json` format in `.huskies/README.md` so other projects can produce it from any language
|
||||||
- [ ] Format is extensible for other languages (Go, Python, etc.) — each entry has file path and line coverage percentage
|
- [ ] Huskies server has zero language-specific coverage logic — all intelligence is in the project's `script/test_coverage`
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Out of Scope
|
## Out of Scope
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|||||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user